Filipe Manana 1af56070e3 Btrfs: send, don't error in the presence of subvols/snapshots
If we are doing an incremental send and the base snapshot has a
directory with name X that doesn't exist anymore in the second
snapshot and a new subvolume/snapshot exists in the second snapshot
that has the same name as the directory (name X), the incremental
send would fail with -ENOENT error. This is because it attempts
to lookup for an inode with a number matching the objectid of a
root, which doesn't exist.

Steps to reproduce:

    mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd
    mount /dev/sdd /mnt

    mkdir /mnt/testdir
    btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/mysnap1

    rmdir /mnt/testdir
    btrfs subvolume create /mnt/testdir
    btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/mysnap2

    btrfs send -p /mnt/mysnap1 /mnt/mysnap2 -f /tmp/send.data

A test case for xfstests follows.

Reported-by: Robert White <rwhite@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-06-09 17:20:59 -07:00
..
2014-05-06 13:04:59 -07:00
2014-04-28 16:43:44 +02:00
2014-04-07 10:17:30 -07:00
2014-05-05 09:31:33 +03:00
2014-04-19 13:23:31 -07:00
2014-04-04 15:50:08 -07:00
2014-02-07 16:08:57 -08:00
2014-02-07 16:08:57 -08:00
2014-04-01 23:19:09 -04:00
2014-04-01 23:19:08 -04:00
2014-04-01 23:19:08 -04:00
2014-04-01 23:19:09 -04:00
2014-05-28 01:54:52 -04:00
2014-04-16 11:53:08 -07:00