Alexey Dobriyan 312ec7e50c proc: make struct proc_dir_entry::namelen unsigned int
1. namelen is declared "unsigned short" which hints for "maybe space savings".
   Indeed in 2.4 struct proc_dir_entry looked like:

        struct proc_dir_entry {
                unsigned short low_ino;
                unsigned short namelen;

   Now, low_ino is "unsigned int", all savings were gone for a long time.
   "struct proc_dir_entry" is not that countless to worry about it's size,
   anyway.

2. converting from unsigned short to int/unsigned int can only create
   problems, we better play it safe.

Space is not really conserved, because of natural alignment for the next
field.  sizeof(struct proc_dir_entry) remains the same.

Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2011-03-23 19:46:37 -07:00
..
2011-03-17 14:02:57 +01:00
2011-02-25 11:12:37 -08:00
2011-02-21 22:31:47 +00:00
2011-03-10 13:22:34 -06:00
2011-01-07 17:50:26 +11:00
2011-03-03 01:28:17 -05:00
2011-03-23 19:46:17 -07:00
2011-01-07 17:50:26 +11:00
2011-01-14 09:23:36 -08:00
2011-01-12 20:03:42 -05:00
2011-03-02 22:27:36 +01:00
2011-01-07 17:50:26 +11:00
2011-03-17 14:02:57 +01:00
2011-03-21 00:45:50 -04:00
2011-03-23 19:46:18 -07:00
2011-03-01 15:47:58 +01:00
2011-03-17 14:02:57 +01:00
2011-03-23 19:46:17 -07:00
2011-01-07 17:50:26 +11:00
2011-01-07 17:50:26 +11:00
2011-01-07 17:50:26 +11:00
2011-03-03 01:28:16 -05:00
2011-03-23 19:46:19 -07:00
2011-03-23 19:46:19 -07:00
2011-03-21 00:16:09 -04:00
2011-03-15 02:21:44 -04:00
2011-01-07 17:50:27 +11:00
2011-03-21 00:16:08 -04:00
2011-01-13 17:32:32 -08:00
2011-03-21 01:10:41 -04:00
2011-01-07 17:50:33 +11:00
2011-03-14 09:15:28 -04:00