Pavel Machek
40599072dc
ACPI: scheduling in atomic via acpi_evaluate_integer ()
...
Now I know why I had strange "scheduling in atomic" problems:
acpi_evaluate_integer() does malloc(..., irqs_disabled() ? GFP_ATOMIC
: GFP_KERNEL)... which is (of course) broken.
There's no way to reliably tell if we need GFP_ATOMIC or not from
code, this one for example fails to detect spinlocks held.
Fortunately, allocation seems small enough to be done on stack.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
Acked-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2008-11-26 17:39:06 -05:00
..
2008-10-22 23:14:49 -04:00
2008-11-11 21:17:26 -05:00
2008-10-22 23:14:50 -04:00
2008-10-16 20:45:35 -04:00
2008-10-22 23:14:49 -04:00
2008-10-22 23:14:48 -04:00
2008-10-22 23:14:45 -04:00
2008-11-16 10:09:34 -08:00
2008-11-06 21:51:02 -05:00
2008-10-22 23:14:48 -04:00
2008-11-11 21:14:49 -05:00
2008-11-07 21:44:37 -05:00
2008-10-22 23:33:29 -04:00
2008-11-26 17:23:10 -05:00
2008-02-14 02:43:39 -05:00
2008-11-07 21:45:16 -05:00
2008-11-11 21:17:26 -05:00
2008-11-07 21:44:37 -05:00
2008-11-07 21:44:37 -05:00
2008-11-07 21:45:04 -05:00
2008-10-22 23:33:29 -04:00
2008-11-26 17:16:45 -05:00
2008-04-29 08:06:22 -07:00
2008-11-07 21:44:37 -05:00
2008-11-07 23:49:23 -05:00
2008-11-07 21:45:29 -05:00
2008-11-11 21:15:50 -05:00
2008-10-11 02:47:33 -04:00
2008-10-22 23:33:29 -04:00
2008-02-07 03:33:23 -05:00
2008-07-16 23:27:07 +02:00
2008-11-11 21:12:05 -05:00
2008-11-06 15:30:19 -05:00
2008-10-23 10:20:36 -07:00
2008-11-11 21:14:15 -05:00
2008-11-11 21:17:03 -05:00
2008-11-07 21:44:37 -05:00
2008-11-07 21:44:37 -05:00
2008-11-07 21:44:37 -05:00
2008-11-07 21:44:37 -05:00
2008-11-06 20:51:59 -05:00
2008-10-23 00:11:07 -04:00
2008-10-22 23:33:29 -04:00
2007-12-14 15:14:06 -05:00
2008-11-11 21:17:03 -05:00
2008-11-11 21:17:26 -05:00
2008-08-21 08:45:39 +02:00
2008-11-11 21:14:49 -05:00
2008-10-25 04:07:13 -04:00
2008-11-26 17:39:06 -05:00
2008-11-11 21:15:50 -05:00
2008-11-11 21:15:50 -05:00
2008-11-06 21:37:19 -05:00