Jan Beulich 3c1596efe1 mm: don't use alloc_bootmem_low() where not strictly needed
Since alloc_bootmem() will never return inaccessible (via virtual
addressing) memory anyway, using the ..._low() variant only makes sense
when the physical address range of the allocated memory must fulfill
further constraints, espacially since on 64-bits (or more generally in all
cases where the pools the two variants allocate from are than the full
available range.

Probably the use in alloc_tce_table() could also be eliminated (based on
code inspection of pci-calgary_64.c), but that seems too risky given I
know nothing about that hardware and have no way to test it.

Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2009-09-22 07:17:38 -07:00
..
2009-03-15 07:03:15 +01:00
2009-06-15 15:20:40 +02:00
2009-07-19 18:27:51 +02:00
2009-03-13 11:57:22 +01:00
2009-06-20 17:53:13 +02:00
2009-07-11 10:17:08 +02:00
2009-08-31 11:09:40 +02:00
2009-08-31 11:09:40 +02:00
2009-06-17 21:35:10 -07:00
2009-02-10 13:13:23 +01:00
2009-02-23 00:08:11 +01:00
2009-06-16 19:47:28 -07:00
2009-03-21 16:57:04 +05:30
2009-08-09 22:28:34 +02:00
2009-02-09 12:16:05 +01:00
2009-03-21 16:55:45 +05:30
2009-02-23 00:08:11 +01:00
2009-08-31 11:09:40 +02:00
2009-01-20 17:14:28 +01:00
2009-07-14 16:25:05 +02:00
2009-09-20 20:25:03 +02:00
2009-06-11 23:31:52 +02:00
2009-07-19 18:27:51 +02:00
2009-09-16 10:21:10 +02:00
2009-03-21 16:55:24 +05:30
2009-09-20 16:00:18 +05:30
2009-09-20 20:25:03 +02:00
2009-02-17 17:52:44 +01:00