Luis R. Rodriguez 6727bb9c6a kernel/module.c: avoid ifdefs for sig_enforce declaration
There's no need to require an ifdef over the declaration
of sig_enforce as IS_ENABLED() can be used. While at it,
there's no harm in exposing this kernel parameter outside of
CONFIG_MODULE_SIG as it'd be a no-op on non module sig
kernels.

Now, technically we should in theory be able to remove
the #ifdef'ery over the declaration of the module parameter
as we are also trusting the bool_enable_only code for
CONFIG_MODULE_SIG kernels but for now remain paranoid
and keep it.

With time if no one can put a bullet through bool_enable_only
and if there are no technical requirements over not exposing
CONFIG_MODULE_SIG_FORCE with the measures in place by
bool_enable_only we could remove this last ifdef.

Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: cocci@systeme.lip6.fr
Signed-off-by: Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
2015-05-28 11:32:13 +09:30
..
2015-04-27 23:11:49 -04:00
2015-04-17 09:04:08 -04:00
2015-04-21 09:33:10 -07:00
2015-04-11 22:27:55 -04:00
2015-04-12 21:03:31 +02:00
2015-04-12 20:58:24 +02:00
2015-02-24 08:41:07 +01:00
2015-04-30 09:35:41 -07:00
2014-12-04 14:34:54 -05:00
2014-12-22 15:40:48 +01:00
2015-01-17 10:02:23 +13:00
2015-04-15 15:06:55 -04:00
2014-12-10 17:41:10 -08:00