Jeff Layton d7c86ff8cd cifs: don't use vfsmount to pin superblock for oplock breaks
Filesystems aren't really supposed to do anything with a vfsmount. It's
considered a layering violation since vfsmounts are entirely managed at
the VFS layer.

CIFS currently keeps an active reference to a vfsmount in order to
prevent the superblock vanishing before an oplock break has completed.
What we really want to do instead is to keep sb->s_active high until the
oplock break has completed. This patch borrows the scheme that NFS uses
for handling sillyrenames.

An atomic_t is added to the cifs_sb_info. When it transitions from 0 to
1, an extra reference to the superblock is taken (by bumping the
s_active value). When it transitions from 1 to 0, that reference is
dropped and a the superblock teardown may proceed if there are no more
references to it.

Also, the vfsmount pointer is removed from cifsFileInfo and from
cifs_new_fileinfo, and some bogus forward declarations are removed from
cifsfs.h.

Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Suresh Jayaraman <sjayaraman@suse.de>
Acked-by: Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <sfrench@us.ibm.com>
2010-10-12 18:08:01 +00:00
..
2010-06-16 18:05:05 +02:00
2010-08-09 16:48:53 -04:00
2010-09-17 12:30:31 -07:00
2010-08-18 01:01:33 -04:00
2010-08-05 14:23:45 -05:00
2010-08-09 16:48:45 -04:00
2010-08-18 01:09:01 -04:00
2010-08-18 06:21:10 -04:00
2010-08-09 16:48:17 -04:00
2010-08-09 16:48:16 -04:00
2010-08-09 16:47:49 -04:00
2010-08-18 01:09:01 -04:00
2010-08-18 01:09:01 -04:00
2010-08-14 00:24:24 +02:00
2010-08-09 16:47:31 -04:00
2010-08-09 16:48:00 -04:00
2010-08-18 01:09:01 -04:00
2010-08-18 01:09:01 -04:00
2010-08-18 08:35:48 -04:00
2010-08-18 08:35:48 -04:00
2010-08-18 08:35:46 -04:00
2010-08-18 08:35:48 -04:00
2010-08-18 08:35:48 -04:00
2010-08-18 08:35:47 -04:00
2010-08-18 08:35:48 -04:00
2010-08-09 16:48:44 -04:00
2010-08-18 08:35:48 -04:00
2010-08-09 16:47:43 -04:00