Peter Zijlstra e17036dac1 sched: fix update_min_vruntime
Impact: fix SCHED_IDLE latency problems

OK, so we have 1 running task A (which is obviously curr and the tree is
equally obviously empty).

'A' nicely chugs along, doing its thing, carrying min_vruntime along as it
goes.

Then some whacko speed freak SCHED_IDLE task gets inserted due to SMP
balancing, which is very likely far right, in that case

update_curr
  update_min_vruntime
    cfs_rq->rb_leftmost := true (the crazy task sitting in a tree)
      vruntime = se->vruntime

and voila, min_vruntime is waaay right of where it ought to be.

OK, so why did I write it like that to begin with...

Aah, yes.

Say we've just dequeued current

schedule
  deactivate_task(prev)
    dequeue_entity
      update_min_vruntime

Then we'll set

  vruntime = cfs_rq->min_vruntime;

we find !cfs_rq->curr, but do find someone in the tree. Then we _must_
do vruntime = se->vruntime, because

 vruntime = min_vruntime(vruntime := cfs_rq->min_vruntime, se->vruntime)

will not advance vruntime, and cause lags the other way around (which we
fixed with that initial patch: 1af5f730fc1bf7c62ec9fb2d307206e18bf40a69
(sched: more accurate min_vruntime accounting).

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Tested-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Acked-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: <stable@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2009-01-15 15:12:19 +01:00
..
2009-01-09 03:39:43 -05:00
2009-01-08 08:31:10 -08:00
2008-10-16 11:21:30 -07:00
2008-09-14 16:25:35 +02:00
2009-01-06 15:59:27 -08:00
2008-12-10 08:01:54 -08:00
2008-08-13 12:55:10 +02:00
2008-10-20 15:43:10 +02:00
2009-01-08 08:31:02 -08:00
2009-01-08 08:31:12 -08:00
2008-09-02 19:21:40 -07:00
2009-01-05 13:09:49 +01:00
2009-01-06 11:07:15 +01:00
2009-01-15 15:12:19 +01:00
2008-11-05 10:30:14 +01:00
2009-01-15 15:07:28 +01:00
2008-11-19 18:49:57 -08:00
2008-12-31 15:11:46 +01:00
2008-10-16 11:21:47 -07:00
2008-10-16 11:21:31 -07:00